The Real Nature of Light

The study of "non-academic" Optics is the true way to  comprehend the way our material Universe is constructed, because there is nothing but "simulated light" in all the Universe, in it's multitude of compressed and expanded electrical forms. I would suggest reading all of the works by Walter Russell and especially his Home Study Course in order to understand the way gravity both "compresses and expands"  electricity into dense incandescent light and vacuous black light, to create all the myriad of observable conditions of our Universe through their opposing spiral wave motions.  The study of vortices of gravity controlled light reveals the true bi-directional wave nature of our curved and divided electric Universe of omnipresent light

The current misconceptions relating to light in academic circles (photon-particle/wave duality) is partially due to the referenced time measure of light as related in the next three paragraphs. This misconception is further due to the false interpretations of experiments which seem to suggest that light is a particle (wave packet) which it is not, false assumptions about the nature of light which are provably wrong  and false conclusions based on incomplete observations relating to it's movements.

"The photon has energy that is equal to "hf " where "h" is Planck's constant and "f " is the frequency of the photon. Planck's constant is, therefore, the energy in one wave of a photon (which is supposed to be a particle). The term "f " is actually the number of events happening in one second, or the number of waves passing in one second. Since the particle physicists insist that the photon is a particle and not a wave, I suppose they think that the particle wiggles to establish a frequency (number of wiggles in one second). Here one wiggle would have the energy equal to Planck's constant "h".

The photon as explained by most of our theoretical physicists, has energy proportional to its frequency. This is not precisely true and causes enough confusion, as so stated, to upset the thought processes of those who wish to understand what a photon is. A natural photon is created by a single electron falling from one energy level to another within an atom (the academic explanation), and is doing so while vibrating at a particular frequency. However, this frequency is almost never radiated for precisely one second. So the energy of the natural photon is never really proportional to "hf " because f  is based upon one second while the photon is not. It is only the concept of the photon as created by men that adheres to the one-second rule. Nature could not care what men come up with and Mother Nature will continue to make her photons last for intervals of time other than one second. The only reason that the energy of "hf " is given as the theoretical energy of a photon is to compare the energy of photons for a period that is the same for each and to conform to our system of time measuring. These are valid reasons, but saying that it is a correct measure of photon energy is misleading.

To understand a bit more about our difficulties in understanding due to time, one must realize that almost all our calculations are based upon a time of one second (or in other cases, an hour, a day, etc.). When one second is used in physics, it is very handy because one second has the value of "one" and if added or removed from an equation, is not a cause for alarm. Anything multiplied by one still has the same magnitude. Anything divided by one still has the same magnitude. So one second is sometimes not seen and is also considered a constant of sorts by our subconscious minds. But nature does not care much about a time interval of one second". (Electro-Magnetic Radiation)

When the misinterpretation of the photoelectric effect is added to this misconception  of a so-called "particle-wave duality" we get the following: "But then experimentation with the photoelectric effect led Einstein to the conclusion that light is "quantized" in the form of photons. In fact, the shorter the electromagnetic wavelength (and hence, the more energetic the wave), the more particle-like an electromagnetic wave appears. It is only in cases where the size of the particle is close to the wavelength -- as with an electron -- that the "duality" becomes truly perplexing. This description is an oversimplification, however, because particle-like behavior is a function of the detection device -- particularly the relative size of the device. The fact that the particle-like electron is associated with such a short wavelength is the reason that higher resolution (less diffraction) can be obtained with an electron microscope than with a light microscope". (The Copenhagen Interpretation of QM)

Nature's Trinity Principle seen in Wave Optics: Pressure Zones in Wave-fields.

The 3d Vesica Piscii are Electric Light Lenses which give form to all Space Geometry

The North and the South "magnetic poles" of all objects are extended points of "Still Magnetic Light" which measure the "physical" distance of electrical extension attributed to any material body as the positive (contracting) and negative (expanding) electrical vortex currents thrust away and through each other.  This pole remains motionless in rotation and acts as a fulcrum for rotating bodies. The expansion of radiation via centrifugal motion to balance the polar extensions into spherical bodies is divided by an equatorial East-West pole of rotation, which creates two hemispheres of opposition and is the physical basis for all matter. The theoretical/mathematical particles with only one charge or only one magnetic pole (monopole) are academic shenanigans and are an impossibility in the real Universe. They need to be seen as expanding light (negative) or contracting light (positive) in their preponderance rather than negative or positively charged "particles" according to the very limited "sensory based" empirical observations conducted in so-called laboratories and accelerators.  (Electro-Magnetic Radiation)