The Vortex Solar System proved by Dr. Keshava Bhat. This means the end of the academic, helio-centric “clock work face” orbit theory, invented by the “catholic military priest” nicolas copernicus and later cherished by newton, brahe, kepler, galileo, einstein, hawking, sagan and the rest of their academic ilk
The proof of Dr. Bhat’s assertion that the outer planets can be seen throughout the year! The inner ones disappear in the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun, they do not pass behind it as claimed by academia. The two to three weeks the outer planets disappear is due to their being within the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun from an Earth bound perspective.
Definition of Heliacal Rising – Lit., rising with the Sun. When a planet or a star, after it has been hidden by the Sun’s rays, becomes again visible.
Animation showing the changing aspect of Saturn’s rings at various opposition dates from 1993 to 2020, with additional orbital and observational details. The image is shown with Celestial North up (note that astronomical telescopes will normally show images inverted). If Saturn Wobbled this much in its so-called “orbit” the rings would surely be scattered everywhere and not on a pancake like plane, as seen in astronomical images.
Note, Saturn’s rings change their angle to our Earth bound observations, which is due to our mutual helical trajectories. If the planets orbited the Sun upon its ecliptic as academic clock work face diagrams claim, then this would not be remotely possible. The academic helio-centric Copernican model of the Solar System is kaput!
Note, if you imagine that the Earth is represented by the 12 green balls surrounding the Sun and project the Sun forward, past your computer screen, onto the tip of a Vortex Cone which centers the helical paths of the planets which follow it, you will see the true dynamic motions of our Solar System.
The Great Solar Serpent
YouTube link: Video Playlist for the Vortex Solar System Model
The Vortex Solar System of the late and great, Dr. Keshava Bhat, M. Sc., Ph.D., of Manipal, India
This playlist explores the causes of the helical trajectory of our Solar System. Unfortunately the academics in the case “our Solar System’s Orbit” opted for an imaginary binary star theory. There is no other star as is clearly seen, so it is sad they did not trash this theory.
The Path of the Solar Serpent’s Vortex- drawn in 1880, from The OAHSPE
1, Sun. 2, Mercury. 3, Earth. 4, Mars. 5, Artaea. 6, Vesta. 7, Ceres. 8, Jupiter. 9, Saturn. 10. Uranus.
The reason we have a helical trajectory above and below the galactic ecliptic is because we are moving with other stars in a huge vortex arm of the galaxy which moves us above and below the galactic ecliptic in 25,625 year cycles for each hemisphere.
This proves the helical trajectory of our Solar System which is what Dr. Keshava Bhat discovered with his personal observations of the Solar System from equatorial regions around the globe for a period of 40 years.
Our Solar System is a huge Vortex with the planets following the Sun, we are not orbiting it as quackademicians have been claiming since the time of Copernicus!
Also a must read!
Helical Helix :Solar System a Dynamic Process
Written by: Dr. Keshava Bhat
Figure 19b page 35
This diagram demonstrates that the so-called tilting of the Earth’s Axis is an illusion due to our position in the Master Vortex of the Sun above and below it’s Ecliptic at peaks called solstices and twice a year as we intersect the ecliptic at the Equinoxes. The illusion to our senses is created by a belief in academic clock work orbits on a flat plane, which would mean that the Earth would have to tilt to account for this process. According to Dr. Bhat the Earth is not tilting at all. It is following the Sun in a Vortex trajectory and the seasons are seen to change due to our position in relationship to the ecliptic plane of the Solar Vortex.
“If only one can pause for a while and think retrospectively, the formidable scientific empire erected through centuries is crumbling down”. Dr. Bhat’s, “Book 1998″, (Chapter 4: Genetic Engineering: Gate to Heaven or Hell?)
The Sensational Spiral, Screwing, Solar System Spermatozoa like Spectacle of our Sun
Born in Pallathadka, South India on January 3 1940 and passed on into the higher realms
July 25th 2010, while vacationing in Yellow Stone Park. He was brought up in
constant touch with natural life by his parents, Pallathadka Subraya Bhat and
Lakshmi Amma. He is married to Devaki and has four children, all born in
Graduated from the Madras University in B.Sc ( 1959 ), M.Sc (1961) and
Ph.D in Botany (1966)
Worked as a Research Assistant in the Madras Presidency College, Madras
(1966-1968) and obtained the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
(C.S.I.R) senior fellowship in 1968-1969.
Worked as a Senior Professor at the Universidad de Oriente, in Cumana,
Venezuela from 1969 to 1987 teaching Botany at both under graduate and
post graduate levels.
In addition to the large number of scientific papers presented both at national
and international levels, he has authored the following books.
Herbolario Tropical (1981)
Ayuda para el estudio de plantas con flores (1982)
Que Como y Cuando comer (1984)
Herbolario Tropical : Una manera sencilla de vivir mejor (1985)
Las Bases del Naturismo : Naturaleza y bienestar humano (1991)
El Sentido de la Vida , desde el embarazo hasta la muerte (1994)
La Vuelta al Conuco : Produccin Naturista para un mundo en crisis (Co
Goodbye to Ruling Scientific Model, proposal for a new science (1997)
Sarala chikitseyinda samagra chintanadedege (Kavyalaya Mysore 2005)
The so-called “precession of the equinoxes”
Dr.Bhat is an ethnobotanist promoting Natural Health Reeducation
Movement. He has been teaching and training people on his philosophy in
different countries around the world. (Venezuela, Peru, Colombia, Brazil,
Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Mexico, Bolivia,
Guadaloupe, United States of America, Canada, France, Spain, Italy and
Was elected as a member of the committee of experts in medicinal plants of
developing countries during the first congress on medicinal plants held at
Arusha, Tanzania in 1990. This event was jointly sponsored by the World
Health Organization, South commission and the Government of Tanzania.
Participated in the Earth Summit held at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 1992.
Presented papers at the International conference on Nutrition and Health held
at Rome, Italy in December 1992.
Presented papers at the International conference on Medicinal Plants held at
Bangalore, India in February 1998.
He thinks that the only solution to combat the prevailing health problems in
the world, especially in the developing tropical countries is by means of self
sufficiency, proper education, correct utilization of the existing natural
resources and by implementing adequate change in living habits.
1. Herbolario Tropical : Una manera sencilla de vivir mejor .1985.
Versions in Spanish, English and French.
450 folk remedies using 64 tropical plants.
A popular house hold guide.
More than 120 thousand copies sold out.
2. Las bases del Naturismo : Naturaleza y el bienestar humano . 1991.
Versions in English and Spanish
Only Spanish version available.
A practical guide to youngsters regarding responsibilities as parents,
delivery, child care, education, first aid.
Problems and possible solutions with senior citizens.
Includes a severe criticism of Cartesian model of experimental science
with a proposal for a dynamic science.
4. El cosmos a traves del tunel espiralado infinito : Una
interpretacion de los conceptos sobre nuestro lugar en la boveda
English version available.
Describes a new model for the solar system . A helical orbit is
described instead of a heliocentric orbit for planets.
5. Vuelta al Conuco : Produccion naturista en un mundo en
A practical guide to farm work in order to develop a sustainable natural
society in the tropics. 75 tropical crops are described.
6. Good bye to ruling scientific model , proposal for a new
Only English version available.
A pioneer think tank material for further expansion with examples of
new concepts, approaches , research and findings. A challenge to
7. Ayuda para el estudio de las plantas con flores (UDO, Oriente
A practical guide and dichotomous key up to generic level for the
study of flowering plants from the American tropics useful for students
at pre and post graduate levels.
8. Sarala chikitseyinda samagra chintanadege ( Kavyalaya Mysore
A compilation of folk remedies and some chapters on new approach to
In the year 1999 after celebrating 30 years of the reeducation movement in
Venezuela, the govt of Venezuela through its establishments at Puerto Ordaz
kept at my disposal 1160 hectares of Tropical Rain Forests on the banks of
the Orinoco river at Delta Amacuro state. The main purpose was to develop
a sustainable village model for tropical forests around the world, without
damaging the natural resources . Sustainable agriculture, controlled
ecotourism, health villages, alternate energy generation with sustainable
technology and integrated education system were projected.
In the year 2001 the project had to be abandoned due to the absence of
human resources to carry on the activities.
ETHNOBOTANICAL GARDEN, CHARA CHAKRA
Established in 1979 at Cumana, Sucre state, Venezuela.
A collection of 170 tropical plants, most of them considered as weeds in the
agricultural science is grown for educational purposes and maintained.
Regular short term workshops on sustainable agriculture, nutrition ,
astrophysics, health and diseases , yoga, garment making are held. Free
orientation on health and nutrition is given to the general public and the
community every week . Trained people work on similar lines all over
Venezuela and in about 18 other countries based on the proposed system.
FUNDAVIME, a foundation registered in 1989 started functioning to
promote, publish, conduct international and national seminars and workshops
to demonstrate the sustainability of this method.
Sustainable farms are maintained on the same principles in Puerto Rico,
Dominican Republic, Colombia and other countries. Other centres are
being arranged progressively.
Efforts are made to establish an open University to promote all the ideas
related to this movement .
Proposed future projects
I personally feel a need to establish a New Science Research Institute in
India to train atleast 10 experts each in the following aspects of dynamic
1 . Astrophysics
Shape and orbits of planets, space travel, climate, ozone layer, hurricanes,
sea level, origin and flow of rivers and many more related interesting topics.
2. Health and Nutrition
Treatment for tropical diseases like Leishmaniasis cutanea, Diabetes, Cancer,
Allergies, Asthma, Psoriasis, Vitiligo, Multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons disease,
Alzheimers disease, AIDS, Heart attack, Cerebro vascular accident, all kinds
of Gastrointestinal disorders etc . with local and natural resources.
3. Health care combined with ecotourism
4. Ethnobotany (Classical Phytochemistry not used)
5. Botany (With a totally different perspective)
6. Sustainable Agriculture, Nutrition, Art of cooking and eating healthy
7. Life sciences and yoga ; Material Sciences.
8. Soft technology to obtain sustainable energy, clean air and water.
9. Dynamic science, Philosophy on science and think tank
10. Integral Education
New literature to support these lines of thought is under preparation. About
500 pages of manuscripts is ready for publication shortly.
At present, Dr. Bhat is engaged in conducting seminars and workshops in
several tropical countries in and around the Caribbean coast.
Jardin Etnobotanico CHARA CHAKRA
Via Tres Picos, Cumana 6101 Edo Sucre,
Dr. P.Keshava Bhat,
Opp. Industrial Estate,
Alevoor Road, Manipal, 576104, India
Tel : 0091-820 -2570953
Excerpts from Dr. Keshava Bhat’s Book
Solar System a Dynamic Process
“Ruthless negation of
other paradigms as superstition permitted the modern science and
technology to project itself as the sole representative of Science as
true knowledge. This is why in every school program the contents
are copied from the mainstream paradigm”.
Newton’s first law supposes or assumes that a body remains at
rest. Today no celestial body is at rest. Therefore, this assumption
is not substantiated…. or if in motion it remains in uniform motion
with constant speed in a straight line unless it is acted on by an
unbalanced external force.
A straight line on a globe is only theoretical and practically it
becomes a curve. Again a rotating Earth or any other celestial body
going its orbit is bound to encounter with external forces at every
instant and can never be expected to maintain a straight line.
If acceleration is to be considered, there is no possibility of starting
with zero at any time or at any place.
Therefore, the first law becomes obsolete.
The second law – when all bodies are in motion an acceleration
produced by an unbalanced force acting on a body is proportional
to the magnitude of the net force and invariably proportional to the
mass of the body
F=ma P=mg (weight=mass x gravity)
This also becomes obsolete because on a moving object where we
are located and form part of the system, how to determine its mass
or net force?
The situation is much clear in Heisenberg’s uncertainty
principle It is impossible to measure accurately both the positional
and momentum of a particle simultaneously.
The third law of Newton states that when ever one body exerts a
force upon a second body, the second body exerts a force upon the
first body. These forces are equal in magnitude and oppositely
This statement assumes that both bodies are initially at rest. Also
assumes that one body moves faster than the other. The statement
assumes that the bodies move in straight lines. Each body moves in
n – dimension and the movement is continuous. This being the case
such assumptions become historic but obsolete.
The time of action of one body is totally different from the time of
Both the curvature of the space- time unit on one hand which flows
eternally as well as the impossibility of time flowing backward in
the reverse direction on the other are sufficient reasons to logically
discard the stated assumptions.
Daily observations are to be marked on a sheet of paper at a definite
time (local/ standard/ universal). Noon 12m is the best in the tropics;
especially in the Northern hemisphere.
A period of one year is the minimum time required for this study.
On cloudy / rainy days the observation may be difficult or impossible.
But observations adjacent to these days should be sufficient to bridge
For the observation of the lunar motion monthly readings are
necessary. In this case the phases of the moon and visibility at the
time of observation are factors to be taken into account.
By tracing the incident light on the paper a design is obtained
corresponding to the Ana lemma.
This proves that the planet always remains on one side of the Sun
throughout the year. If the planet were to go around the Sun six
months a year this observation is not possible.
The plane of displacement of our planet being equatorial the
planetary axis is parallel to the solar axis. This is true for all the
planets of the system.
Seen from the Northern hemisphere at any time of the year the Polaris
is observed in almost the same position probably because the star is
moving in the same direction. Our Sun follows a helical orbit around
the orbit of Polaris and one 360ï¿½ year corresponds to 225.000
terrestrial years according to astronomical data. This permits the
relative position of other stars in the zodiac or in the sky, their
apparent disposition to explain equinoctial precession phenomenon.
The polar shift of the axis leads to the directional change of the
photosphere and this in turn explains the process.
Astronomical calculations made by the XVI, XVII and XVIII century
astronomers never imagined that this happened. They assumed that
Sun is stationary. No wonder all the calculations are made with such
assumptions and perhaps they have to be calculated once again.
It is also possible that the heliocentric orbits described for all the
planets are again assumptions with no confirmation by direct
measurement or observations.
The Greek observers like Aristarchus (About 270 B.C.) had
suggested a heliocentric orbit for planets and the credit goes to
Nicolas Copernicus (1514, 1.543) [Mikolaj Kopernik Polish
churchman] for confirming such hypothesis. Based on these ideas
or assumptions Tycho Brahe, Kepler and Newton arrived at
mathematical models to describe the same phenomenon.
All the planets known at that time are supposed to move along
heliocentric orbits along the equatorial plane with particular degrees
of axial inclinations for each one. The individual orbits are
considered to be elliptic
In a dynamic system the Earth should accelerate to go beyond the
Sun during six months but decelerate to return to the area behind
the Sun. The Sun is estimated to maintain about 20km/s revolution
on its orbit. Fresh calculations may be necessary to describe this
type of motion.
The constellations at the background are sufficient evidence to deny
the heliocentric orbits for planets.
The Sun at 500 light seconds
distance, when visible within a cone of 30ï¿½ maintaining a background
of one constellation, say for example Aries, (Hamel at 68ly) the
Earth maintains in the opposite constellation at midnight, namely
Libra. After six months to maintain heliocentric orbit, the mid day
of today should become midnight and the midnight should become
midday. This has not taken place!
Remember the Polaris located just above the North Pole at a distance
of 430ly. The helical orbit of the Sun follows the helical orbit of the
Polaris and therefore, Polaris is visible from the Northern hemisphere
always in the same place.
Other planets also follow identical helical orbits. The solid angle
at the source of light and the distances to each planet are
maintained uniformly. Planets Mercury and Venus are closer to the
Sun and are called the inner planets whereas Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,
Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are considered as outer ones. Fresh
calculations and models will have to be made to describe the
respective orbits. A comprehensive three- dimensional model of the
solar system is possible only after that.
When observed after about 56.000 years, 90ï¿½ solar displacement
along its orbit, the Polaris is bound to be visible at another place
and that has to be explained in this way. It is not the Earth, but the
Sun that has moved along its orbit. Since Earth follows the Sun, the
optical illusion explains a helical orbit for each celestial body, orbit
of our star served as reference for another body but dependent on
this one (for helical orbits see under Earth orbit)
30ï¿½ arc in the direction of equatorial plane orbital displacement where
the ram force is maximum (20km/s speed) for the exposed surface
can explain the whole model. If planets were to go round the Sun on
heliocentric orbits, there should be some reference to this
phenomenon in the literature. But as it is, nothing is available.
The heat produced due to friction and infrared rays is more at the
tropical area compared to the rest of the planetary surface. But the
cold front at one Pole and the warmer hemisphere on the other
maintains the extreme conditions during six months each. This
permits the illusion that the visible Sunlight has light and heat in it.
Further it is possible that the atmospheric mantle moves just behind
the hydrosphere and lithosphere following the orbit and obviously
the heat transferred to the gaseous atmosphere moves in respective
orientation of the crescent indicates the relative position of the planet
on its orbit as seen from the earthï¿½s surface. The images of these
crescents through one full orbit should be sufficient to demonstrate
the helical nature of the orbit. The waxing and waning moon also
exhibits the crescent shape when the moon is located in between
the earth and the sun, but on one side. It is note worthy that the
lunar/solar eclipses do not occur every month. This is the clue to the
fact that orbit of the moon is not around the earth. Images of other
planets like Mars, Jupiter and Saturn (visible with unaided eye)
reflect light from a disc 30ï¿½ arc., again visibility only 30ï¿½ conical
constitute a complex system. All calculations will have to be
considered once again.
The natural satellites like
the Moon maintain their own orbits twining around the helical
orbit of the associated planet. The orbits of the natural satellites
(Moons) closely follow behind the planets encircling the respective
planetary orbit. When there are several of these satellites each
one maintains individual orbits but all follow the respective planet.
The illumination coming from photosphere of the Sun, rotating on
its own axis (average 27 days) and maintaining a helical orbit
(equatorial plane) naturally should spread all over. But the receiving
surface of the planet is located at a constant distance (149597893
Km =AU) and the solar axis and that of the Earth are parallel to one
another. Owing to an inclination of 23ï¿½27ï¿½30ï¿½ï¿½ (=46ï¿½55ï¿½ï¿½ solid angle)
at the apex of a cone the Earth is illuminated at this angle. However,
the orbit of the Earth completes the base of this cone maintaining
the angle and the relative distance as a constant. With this design,
the observation of 12 constellations in sequence at the background
can easily be explained maintaining the day/night relation uniformly.
The interpretation of this phenomenon constitutes a new approach
to explain observed facts in nature.
This observation definitely shows that the planet Earth never
maintains a heliocentric orbit at all. Similar situation is observed
with all the planets in the solar system. This statement is totally
contradicting the existing views of Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler,
Galileo, Newton and others including the modern astronomers that
all the planets in the solar system follow heliocentric orbit. In order
to explain the seasonal variations it was necessary to assume the
planetary axis inclination of 23ï¿½27ï¿½30ï¿½ in relation to the solar axis,
consequently the heliocentric orbit had to be extended as an ecliptic.
This assumption has caused all the misconceptions in the name of
Science around the world.
Even after the observation that Sun is not stationary but has its own
orbital displacement in addition to the rotation as a celestial body,
no more calculations and revisions relative to the planetary orbits
are reported. As a matter of fact all celestial bodies are in motion.
Their relative distances remain doubtful. It is time to think in terms
of a dynamic model.
In every case the flow of water is helical leaving sand bunds,
corroded rocks and eroded soil as evidence of this path way. Since
the spirals appear in three dimensions and directions it has been
impossible to detect and describe the natural phenomenon so far.
The human intelligence should make use of this energy without
obstructing the free flow of water.
Celestial bodies, on the other hand, all move with an axis in a definite
pattern that may be identified as HELICAL. This type of rotation or
orbital revolution maintains the body in position in relation to other
components. Action, reaction, interactions and cumulative effects
may be envisaged for the entire system. An observer is involved in
the movement and there is no possibility of proving any point to
any body. As an observer is unable to distinguish the process as a
whole, he should be happy with the outcome. All celestial bodies
move helically at all time.
Scope for applied research
The axial rotation of Earth at 0.5 km/sec (= 1800 km/h) and the
claimed orbital revolution at 30 km/sec (=108,000 km/h) are
significant dynamic forces not utilized for human use. If only a proper
technology is developed to harness these free energies humanity
can enjoy all comforts almost free of cost. It is ever lasting source.
The orbital velocity of the sun is given as 19.9 km/sec. All the planets
and their satellites move along with the main source of power, the
Sun. Each celestial body has its own specifications and calculations
may be taken up by interested parties to include all other planets.
For example, Uranus is known to have an orbit of 84.01 years
duration. It exhibits several uniqueness of its own. Its axis is said to
have an inclination of 98ï¿½ with reference to the Sun. According to
the present approach the orbit of Uranus is so wide that the solid
angle at the cone apex is 98 x 2 = 196ï¿½. Obviously its motion looks
like a somersault. The interval between solstice and solstice is 42
years. The planet rotates in a direction contrary to that of the Earth.